About Us Location Projects Mill Restoration Get involved
Table of contents Featured articles 2009 Calendar Meeting Dates Upcoming Events

Our Current Newsletter   2009 Open House   2009 Heritage Day 
Minitor 2 pagers @ www.gahenryradio.com


 

Shad fishing on the Susquehanna River
 

Native Americans
 

Imagine the amazement and delight of the first Native American who saw a SHAD RUN occur on the Susquehanna River thousands of years ago.  Shad runs occur when shad swim upstream of a river or tributary to lay eggs in ancient spawning grounds. 

 

 During a shad run, which normally occurs in late March through May, millions of shad traveled up the Susquehanna River to lay their eggs which they had done for many years.  The number of shad were of such magnitude that some accounts describe the water in front of the shad as rising three to four feet and being visible for almost a quarter mile away.  The Native Americans were probably thrilled at this food source, so easily caught and in such an abundant supply.

 

 The Native Americans used different methods to catch shad, including baskets made from twigs or vines, carved fishhooks made of antler or bone, bow and arrows, and fishnets made from wild hemp, or at night by spear and torch lights.

 

 Another method Native Americans used was a sluice, that they made by piling rocks to form two walls which narrowed to funnel the shad through a narrow outlet.  The shad could be easily caught as they swam into a basket or trap set at this narrow opening.  The shad could also be driven into a shallow pool of water, the entrance blocked with stones, twigs or vines and shad caught by hand.  Although the spawning period lasted for only a few weeks, many shad could be caught.  The shad were salted, smoked, or dried for winter use.

 

American Shad  

American shad (Alosa sapidissima) is the most popular of six species of shad and herring that live in the Chesapeake Bay. This shad is a handsome fish, with a metallic blue-green back that lightens to silver on the sides with a black spot on the shoulder with several smaller spots trailing behind. The American shad can reach a length of 30 inches, with adult fish weighing 4-8 lbs. They are the largest—and considered the most delicious to eat–of all the shads.

 

The young shad remained for a short period of time in the waters of their birth, before starting their journey back to the ocean.  Unfortunately, the young shad, being very delicate faced a long and dangerous journey.  Tens of millions of young shad started this journey, but millions of young shad were killed on their journey each year after being caught in a sluice, fish dam, basket or trap.  Even damaging the scales on a young shad in handling was fatal because the immature shad were so delicate. 

 

 

Fishing Methods

 

Shad Floats


Although not associated with Washington Boro, is noteworthy to mention a river vessel known as a “Shad Float.”   The Shad Float can be described as a floating fish processing plant.  It was up to 100 foot wide and up to 300 foot in length.  They usually had small buildings placed on them which housed the workers, as well as others used as kitchen/dining area, office, and fish processing.  Some floats supported 50-100 workers at a time.  Containers or vats were used to store the shad after they were cleaned.  The Shad Floats utilized large seine nets and attached guide ropes to deploy and retrieve the nets.  One company based in Havre de Grace, Maryland had a fleet of three floats and their spread nets were close to 3 miles in length.  No floats were known to have been used in the area of Washington Boro.

 

  

Seine Nets


Seine nets used offshore of Washington Boro were smaller than commercial seine nets used on the Shad Floats.  The nets were under 200 feet in length and 15-25 foot in depth.  Often the net was anchored to a fishery located on an island, a tree along the shoreline or a shad battery.  Shad batteries were frequently constructed of a wood or log frame and filled with rocks.  Deploying the seine nets required the use of a large flat bottomed boat, just like those used to transport animals for island farming.  Typically a “lookout” upon spotting the shad, alerted the crew and the boat deployed the net, and as the shad entered the area, arched the boat and net back to the island, shore or battery.  The fish were caught in the net, and fishermen waded in the water removing them by hand.

  

 

Gill Nets


The “Gill Net” was a net that had floats on top and weights on the bottom.  They were spread in similar fashion to the seine net, but before sighting of the shad.  Nets were placed in a channel, some allowing to drift, others anchored.  The shad’s gills were caught in the netting and the fishermen, guiding their boat along the net, collected the fish by hand.  The Gill Net was made illegal in Maryland and Pennsylvania in 1824.

  

 

Dip Nets


The “Dip Net” was another style of net used for shad fishing.  The nets were similar to  present day nets used to catch minnows for bait.  These nets were lowered into a pool, and as the shad passed, the net was raised and the fish removed.  There are records of the owners of island, shorelines or batteries leasing to individuals the right to use their operation.  The owner charged a fee which allowed a person to operate the net for “one dip”.  Lines of customers formed and after a person took his "one dip" he often went to the end of the line to purchase another dip.

  

 

The Shad Wars


In the early part of the 18th-century the Province of Pennsylvania found it necessary to pass laws making it illegal to construct a dam without making provisions for the passage of spawning fish.  Few people followed the little enforced law and the construction of waterway dams continued, and few made provision to allow the shad to pass freely.  This spawned an era know as the "Shad Wars".  In some cases commercial fisheries or residents living above a dam that was obstructing shad spawning, damaged or destroyed the dam to restore free movement of shad, preserving their livelihood.

 

 During the ongoing shad wars, frequent illegal fishing took place.  It was illegal to fish for shad within one half mile of any fish passageway of a dam.  One such incident in the late 1800’s was reported in the “Philadelphia Time”s newspaper. The newspaper reports that five fish wardens were sent to Columbia to enforce fishing laws at the canal.  Having no respect for the law, the shadders overturned the warden’s boat, forcing them to swim to shore.  As they reached the shore they were assaulted by onlookers.  Later, after reaching their hotel, the innkeeper locked the warden’s door for their own safety. 

  Top of page

 

The Tidewater Canal


Just above Washington Boro, a wooden dam, “The Tidewater Canal Dam,” was constructed across the Susquehanna River.  The purpose of this dam was to raise the water level which allowed barges to be towed from the Lancaster County shore across the river to the York County shore.  The dam did not completely block the water, but had breaks which although allowed river vessels to pass downstream.  These breaks also allowed the passing of shad, but the swift current deterred most shad from passing through the openings.

  

 

Washington Boro Shad Fisheries


The islands, sand bars and rock outcroppings of the Susquehanna River near Washington Boro were used as "Shad Fisheries and Batteries."  These were used to anchor seine fishnets, or places where dip nets were lowered into the river current.  Maps developed by the Safe Harbor Waterpower Company in the 1920’s list dozens of batteries, island and shoals used in the fishing for shad.

To the residents along the river, it was apparent that the shad were a source of food as well as a potentially profitable business.  Until the 1700’s shad spawned without obstruction.  Small mill dams and later larger dams spanning the entire width of the Susquehanna River eventually brought an end to the shad fishing industry.  Thomas Jefferson operated shad fishing operations on the Potomac River and shipped much of his catch to England where he could get top dollar.

 

Many of the islands of the Susquehanna were owned by the state of Pennsylvania.  As the state began selling islands to individuals or companies interested in using them for the fishing industry, early records track the Shad fishing industry.  In the last years of the 19th-century almost 50 Shad fisheries or batteries were located near Washington Boro and the catch during those years averaged around 60,000 fish per year.

  

Top of page

Isles of Promise


Public records show the Bitner family of Washington Boro were owners of a series of thirteen islands, that were later the focus of a postcard sold in the early 1900’s.  The card was entitled "Isles of Promise."  These islands were sold individually around 1857.  

 

 

Mud Island and the Ortman Brothers


The local newspaper "The Columbia Spy," printed numerous articles about a large island near the York County shore named "Mud Island."  This island was a very prosperous shad fishery for over 100 years.  The island was owned by Charles Evans but later sold to the Ortman Brothers, John and Isaac, of Washington Borough.  After the construction of the Holtwood Dam in 1910, the Ortman Brothers moved their fishing operations below the dam for a short time.  It was reported in 1911 that “the Ortman Brothers, having moved their fishing operation below the Holtwood dam were catching nearly 500 shad per day.”  Within the next few years shad no longer migrated to the Holtwood Dam and reported catches dwindled.  After completion of the Conowingo Dam, shad fishing in Pennsylvania waters of the Susquehanna River was no more.

 

“Nearly 2000 shad were caught at Ortman's Island battery from Monday midnight on until Tuesday morning at three o'clock.  They are sold at the batteries at from $20-$25 per hundred.”  "Columbia Spy," May 7, 1881

 

“There was plenty of Shad on Friday morning.  The Ortmans caught 700 at Mud Island on Thursday night.” "Columbia Spy," May 21, 1881

Top of page

Mud Island Sold,   John B. Roth, surviving executor of John Bumberger, deceased, sold at public sale, at the Franklin House, on Thursday, one half interest in this celebrated Mud Island and fisheries thereto belonging, about a mile or more below the dam.  The Ortman Brothers John and Isaac-bought it for $3200.  At this figure it is considered cheap.  It has paid a rental of $350 for the past few years.  Its tobacco and shad crops are always immense.”  "Columbia Spy," November 8, 1884

 

“It is reported that Ortman boys at Mud Island Fishery, did some fine fishing on Monday last, capturing in the neighborhood of 500 Shad.  This includes a "tower" of day and night with two seines.”  "Columbia Spy,"  May 2, 1885

 

Frank Miller

Frank Miller resided at 1988 Water Street, the present home of Mr. & Mrs. Harold Williams.  The
property of Mr. Miller's extended to the Susquehanna River, where journal records indicate in
much the same manner of a tenant farmer, would fish for shad for his neighbor, Mr. Geir (Gehr) as well as the Wertz Hotel.  His shad records are from 1902 through 1905.  WBSSRH extends our thanks to Mr. & Mrs. Williams for allowing us to display these pages. 

Click to view records

 

The Wertz Hotel


Older Washington Boro residents remember hearing from parents and family members about “Planked Shad at the Wertz Hotel."   The Wertz Hotel, also known as the Susquehanna House, was known far and wide for these tasty meals.  It is reported that during the spawning season, they served over 100 people per day, sometimes under an outside awning.  It was not uncommon for patrons to enjoy a delicious meal and then board a raft to travel and watch the shad fishermen on Mud Island.

 

Many groups and social organizations met for dinner at the Susquehanna House.  One of the groups was a Lancaster Auto Club.  Local and state politicians were reported to frequent the Wertz Hotel. 

 

The construction of the Holtwood Dam basically put an end to Shad fishing in the Susquehanna River.  The two sets of fish ladders installed at the Holtwood Dam were ineffective in allowing the shad to move up the Susquehanna.

 

 

A Columbia Spy Article

 "WHY IS THE SHAD GROWING SCARCER" is an informative article published in the “Columbia Spy” December 4, 1886 and can be read online from our link (table of contents page) to the “Columbia Spy.”


 


Click for more information
on the American Shad

Top of page

Washington Boro Society for Susquehanna River Heritage  
 P.O. Box  6    
 Washington Boro, PA 17582

email: WBSSRH@aol.com

 

D&E Jazzd

Our WEB site
hosted as a
community
service by D&E
Jazzd Internet
Service